|
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Canadian Content
Colin Mochrie, star of tv, film & fanimutation, has become the public face of a call to "regulate the internet" at some CRTC hearings. Could he become the CanCon Lars Ulrich of the new decade? When you consider how much the internet has loved Mochrie -- enough to cast him in the three-part epic, Colin Mochrie vs. Jesus H. Christ -- it must feel like quite a stab in the back. The only thing worse would be Nug declaring war on hot dogs ...
Here's what Mochrie suggests:
Here's how we can ensure that Canadians will be able to see and share Canadian stories: First, those who are streaming live programs from Canada, through the Internet or to mobile receiving devices, must be licensed and subject to rules equivalent to conventional TV broadcasters.
First, Kinsella just posted a video. Should he be licensed and subject to rules (I don't know what the rules are but I'm pretty sure they suck) equivalent to conventional TV broadcasters? You might argue 'no' because it's just a guy posting a video on his blog. What if there was a Canadian equivalent to Channel101? Do they need to be regulated? Or how about OVN.tv, since they actually charge for content?
The actors mucked it up by equating "broadcasting" with the internet. As soon as it hits the internet, even if it's a streamed episode of 90210, it's no longer broadcasting. Compared to a Channel101 show, that 90210 episode may seem clearly like broadcasting today ... but in terms of policy, they're the same thing and some day any apparent differences won't be there at all.
Mochrie continues:
Second, those who are using new media to make programs available from Canada for viewing at a time and place chosen by the viewer must be licensed and subject to regulations equivalent to other "on-demand" programming undertakings.
Hold on, he confused me! That first thing was about live events and this second thing is about pre-recorded content. I'm not quite sure why that distinction needed to be made in that way ... maybe because a live stream might actually be "broadcasting" if enough people watch it. Ok, he's concerned about his stand-up act being streamed from someone's phone.
Mochrie has one last thing:
Third, if the CRTC is going to create space for Canadian stories in new media, there must be stories to fill that space.To that end, a levy should be imposed on Internet and wireless service providers to fund new media production, modelled on the levy on cable companies. Shouldn't that have been the first thing? Where are his priorities? Anyhow, the most revealing bit comes in the paragraph that follows: New media broadcasting is the future. We need to set out what the rules are going to be now so everyone knows what the terrain looks like and appropriate business models can develop. This is a battle for the future. Again, it's not "broadcasting". In this case you can pretty much assume that "appropriate business models" means "current business models grafted onto the internet." Remember how well that worked out for the music industry? That's why he (and the head of ACTRA) characterizes it as a "battle" ... the old business model isn't suited to the internet so it has to be imposed by force. So, what's a cowboy to do? First, look at what's working. Out in Calgary, istock managed to shake up a multi-billion dollar industry by starting small and evolving a new model. While lots of Luddites feel that the internet glass in half empty, istock showed that there are opportunities for people with a little imagination. I have over 1600 images available for purchase (please buy some or lots) all over the world through istock and Getty -- and that's Canadian content!
Second, the new business models are not going to come from the big, established companies or organizations so funding an 'appropriate model' through a levy is only diverting talent away from the appropriate task; coming up with a new model. istock was created by frustrated people who couldn't break into a stuffy, closed industry. I know lots of people in tv and film scrambling around trying to catch a break ... and one of these days one of them could have a great idea.
11:30 PM
, # ,
|
|
|
|
Contact
info[at]brettlamb[dot]com
My Cartoon Archives
HAPPY CREATURE
MS. JOHNSON
ED LOCKE
Regular reads
Accordion Guy
Bill Doskoch
Daily Dose
Davezilla
Tony Pierce
Warren Kinsella
News
BlogTO
boingboing
Cursor
DIGG
Dork Shelf
Drawn!
FoodForethought
Fleshbot
Garlicster
Global Nerdy
MetaFilter
Mondoville
The Oil Drum
Reddit
The Register
Slashdot
Space.com
Spacing Wire
Torontoist
Treehugger
ZDNet
Arts & comics
Children of the Atom
Chromewaves
Comic Strip
Corrigan
DeadThingsonSticks
Dinosaur Comics
Hollywood North Report
Maakies
MacKay
Sally McKay
Secret Lair
Toronto Comic Jam
Zoilus
Audio
The Bugle
Coverville
Radio Clash
Ramdom Thoughts
Video
Channel101
Toronto blogs
Circadian Shift
Consolation Champs
Crazy Biker Chick
Day in the Life
Dead Robot
Easternblot
estrojenn
Exhausticated
Free Clara
JB Warehouse & EmporiumLiz Vang
Luminescent
Marmalade
Merv
Naked KnitGirl
Photojunkie
Pony
Pshaw
Raymi the Minx
Robot Johnny
Searching for Tao
Secret Storm
Squiddity
TBIT
Canadian blogs
Simple Spendor
Sooey
Confessions of a Monkey
Dust My Broom
Grrl Meets World
Ian King
James Bow
Simple Spendor
Sooey
View from up here
USA blogs
Cityrag
democraticSPACE
Dooce
Explananda
Fred the Blog
Jett Superior
Maakies
MegaBeth
Panopticist
Yoon Choi
Oz blogs
Brett Lamb: OZ
Little Lioness
Penguin Says Yes
UK
B3TA
Rathergood
Brett Lamb
Create Your Badge
A R C H I V E S
2009
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
2008
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
2007
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
2006
JANUARY - 1
JANUARY - 2
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
2005
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
2004
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
[ 2003 ] [ 2002 ] |
|